Recent theoretical and experimental studies have addressed whether the rela
tive importance of aboveground and belowground competition changes along gr
adients of biomass productivity. Results have been contradictory, with some
researchers finding a decrease in the importance of belowground competitio
n and an increase in aboveground competition with increased productivity, a
nd others finding either no relationship. or a positive correlation between
the various factors. Belowground competitive intensity (BCI), resulting fr
om root interactions, and total competitive intensity (TCI), resulting from
both root and shoot interactions, have usually been measured as the propor
tional growth reduction due to competition (relative to growth without comp
etition). Instead of direct measurement, aboveground competitive intensity
(ACI) has been estimated by assuming that aboveground competition and below
ground competition do not interact to affect plant growth, and therefore AC
I + BCI = TCI. In this study, Abutilon theophrasti was used as a focal spec
ies to determine whether an interaction between the two competitive forms c
ould exist. Target plants were grown with varying degrees of interaction wi
th the roots of neighboring plants, through the use of modified root exclus
ion tubes, and by tying back the aboveground neighboring vegetation. In tot
al, 16 combinations of varying intensities of aboveground and belowground i
nteractions with neighbors were created at each of two fertilization levels
. The strength of belowground competition decreased with fertilization, whi
le neither aboveground competition nor total competition (occurring both ab
ove- and belowground simultaneously) varied among fertilization treatments.
Not only was there evidence for an interaction between above- and belowgro
und competition, the form of interaction varied with productivity, switchin
g from no interaction in the unfertilized block to a positive interaction i
n the fertilized block. With fertilization, belowground competition decreas
ed a plant's ability to compete in asymmetric competition for light. These
results contrast with existing models of the role of competition in plant c
ommunities, and a new model is presented. In order to understand the rule o
f aboveground and belowground competition in plant communities, the potenti
al for interactions between the two competitive forms must be considered in
future studies.