Ja. Rodriguez-robles et al., Food habits of the glossy snake, Arizona elegans, with comparisons to the diet of sympatric long-nosed snakes, Rhinocheilus lecontei, J HERPETOL, 33(1), 1999, pp. 87-92
We studied the diet of the North American glossy snake, Arizona elegans, by
examining stomach contents of more than 700 museum specimens, and suppleme
nted our findings with published dietary records. Fifty percent of 107 prey
were lizards and 44% were mammals; birds and snakes composed the remaining
prey. Most lizard prey were diurnal, and presumably were captured when the
y were inactive by nocturnally wide-foraging glossy snakes. Conversely, mos
t rodent prey were nocturnal heteromyids that we suspect were ambushed by A
. elegans, thus raising the possibility that these snakes use alternative h
unting tactics on different prey types. Ninety-Eve percent of the specimens
with food contained a single item, and all 49 prey for which we determined
direction of ingestion were swallowed head-first. Although smaller A. eleg
ans consumed mammals occasionally, specimens that ate mammals were signific
antly larger than those that fed on lizards, and glossy snakes that took bi
rds were larger than those that ate mammals. Larger glossy snakes ate large
r prey and added birds to their diet, but they continued to eat lizards and
mammals, which suggests that there is no absolute ontogenetic change in th
e diet of A. elegans. For any given body size, A. elegans has a longer head
, and thus a larger gape than the sympatric long-nosed snake, Rhinocheilus
lecontei. This difference in relative head length may explain why smaller A
. elegans are capable of predation on mammals, whereas smaller R, lecontei
feed almost exclusively on lizards, and may also account in part for the hi
gher frequency of stout-bodied phrynosomatid lizards and of mammals in the
diet of glossy snakes.