Research on the presence of consumer racial discrimination in the baseball
labor and memorabilia markets has produced contradictory empirical results.
While studies of baseball salaries-find no evidence of discrimination, Nar
dinelli and Simon (1990) and Andersen and La Croix (1991) use data from the
baseball card market to show that the price that consumers pay for a card
depends on the player's race. In this paper we reconsider the evidence of c
onsumer discrimination in the baseball card market. Our study improves on p
revious research by applying more appropriate econometric methods and using
a data set in which card supply is constant and incentives for speculative
demand are weaker. In contradiction to the aforementioned studies, we find
little evidence of racial discrimination This result proves robust across
variable specifications and econometric models.