This critical examination of the kinetic method is carried out as part of a
dialog-in-print with Peter Armentrout and Laszlo Drahos and Karoly Vekey.
We summarise the characteristics of the kinetic method and try to place it
in the context of other thermokinetic methods of making thermochemical dete
rminations, especially the threshold collision-induced dissociation method.
We cover the approximations made in deriving the method and tabulate five
forms of the method which have been used over the past 21 years. We show th
at many criticisms of the method apply to the simplest forms and, conversel
y, that a great deal of information can be obtained from those forms which
do not assume that entropy effects cancel. A number of cases of apparent fa
ilure of the method Ire examined, including the alcohol/Li+ case described
by Armentrout. We encourage continued use of each of the thermochemical met
hods but recommend that these uses be informed by knowledge of the subtleti
es of deriving thermochemical information from relative rate measurements.
Copyright (C) 1999 John Whey & Sons, Ltd.