The thermodynamic parameters of protein reduction (Delta H degrees'(rc) and
Delta S degrees'(rc)) were measured for a number of blue copper proteins i
ncluding spinach plastocyanin, cucumber plastocyanin, Pseudomonas aeruginos
a azurin, Rhus vernicifera stellacyanin, cucumber stellacyanin, and horsera
dish umecyanin through voltammetric techniques in nonisothermal experiments
at neutral pH. Including previous estimates for other members of the same
protein family, we discuss here the thermodynamics of the electron-exchange
reaction for twelve blue copper proteins from different sources. The entha
lpic term (-Delta H degrees'(rc)/F) turns out to be the dominant contributi
on to the reduction potential in this protein class. However, the entropic
term (T Delta S degrees'(rc)/F) heavily affects E degrees', especially for
the azurins. These data were analyzed in the light of the structural and dy
namic information available on protein folding, geometric and electronic fe
atures of copper ligation, and solvation properties of the two redox states
. It is clearly seen that the reduction enthalpy of the subfamily of the "p
hytocyanins" is less negative as compared to that of the other cupredoxins,
most likely owing to a stronger axial ligation of the copper ion (which re
sults in a nearly tetrahedral coordination geometry) and the greater exposi
tion of the site to the solvent, which are both factors that stabilize the
Cu(II) ion. The reduction entropy, which in most cases is negative, is inst
ead apparently related to the salvation properties of the site. In addition
, by analogy with class I cytochromes c, an increase in protein rigidity co
uld also contribute to the entropy loss on reduction. Finally, it is appare
nt that the strategy of protein control of the reduction thermodynamics in
high-potential electron-transfer metalloproteins (blue copper proteins, cla
ss I cytochromes c, HiPIPs) is the same: a dominant enthalpic term arising
from ligand-binding interactions and electrostatic factors at the metal/pro
tein interface, which strongly stabilizes the reduced state, is most often
opposed by a weaker entropic term due to changes in protein dynamics and sa
lvation properties, which disfavors protein reduction.