Purpose: Computerized tomography (CT) is the diagnostic and staging modalit
y of choice for renal neoplasms. Existing imaging modalities are limited by
a 2-dimensional (D) format. Recent advances in computer technology now all
ow the production of high quality 3-D images from helical CT. Nephron spari
ng surgery requires a detailed understanding of renal anatomy. Preoperative
evaluation must delineate the relationship of the tumor to adjacent normal
structures and demonstrate the vascular supply to the tumor for the surgeo
n to conserve as much normal parenchyma as possible. We propose that helica
l CT combined with 3-D volume rendering provides all of the information req
uired for preoperative evaluation and intraoperative management of nephron
sparing surgery cases. We prospectively evaluated the role of 3-D volume re
ndering CT in 60 patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery for renal cell
carcinoma at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Materials and Methods: Triphasic spiral CT was performed preoperatively in
60 consecutive patients undergoing nephron sparing surgery for renal neopla
sms. A 3 to 5-minute videotape was prepared using volume rendering software
which demonstrated the position of the kidney, location and depth of exten
sion of the tumor(s), renal artery(ies) and vein(s), and relationship of th
e tumor to the collecting system. These videotapes were viewed by a radiolo
gist and urologist in the operating room at surgery, and immediately correl
ated with surgical findings. Corresponding renal arteriograms of 19 patient
s were retrospectively compared to 3-D volume rendering CT and operative fi
ndings.
Results: A total of 97 renal masses were identified in 60 cases evaluated w
ith 3-D volume rendering CT before nephron sparing surgery. There were no c
omplications related to the 3-D protocol and 3-D rendering was successful i
n all patients. The number and location of lesions identified by 3-D volume
rendering CT were accurate in all cases, while enhancement and diagnostic
characteristics were consistent with pathological findings in 95 of 97 tumo
rs (98%). Of 77 renal arteries identified at surgery 74 were detected by 3-
D volume rendering CT (96%). Helical CT missed 3 small accessory arteries,
including 1 in a cross fused ectopic kidney. All major venous branches and
anomalies were identified, including 3 circumaortic left renal veins. Of 69
renal veins identified at surgery 64 were detected by 3-D volume rendering
CT (93%). All 5 renal veins missed by CT were small, short, duplicated rig
ht branches of the main renal vein. Renal fusion and malrotation anomalies
were correctly identified in all 4 patients.
Conclusions: The 3-D volume rendering CT accurately depicts the renal paren
chymal and vascular anatomy in a format familiar to most surgeons. The data
integrate essential information from angiography, venography, excretory ur
ography and conventional 2-D CT into a single imaging modality, and can obv
iate the need for more invasive imaging. Additionally, the use of videotape
in an intraoperative setting provides concise, accurate and immediate 3-D
information to the surgeon, and it has become the preferred means of data d
isplay for these procedures at our center.