A two-process model for control of legato articulation across a wide rangeof tempos during piano performance

Citation
Jp. Jacobs et D. Bullock, A two-process model for control of legato articulation across a wide rangeof tempos during piano performance, MUSIC PERC, 16(2), 1998, pp. 169-199
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Performing Arts
Journal title
MUSIC PERCEPTION
ISSN journal
07307829 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
169 - 199
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-7829(199824)16:2<169:ATMFCO>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The key overlap times (KOTs) required for legato articulation vary markedly with tempo. For scales/arpeggios performed at interonset intervals (IOIs) of 100-1000 ms, prior reports show an increasing but nonlinear functional d ependence of KOT on IOI. Because the major nonlinearity appears in the long -IOI (slow-tempo) region, the dependence of KOT on IOI is not attributable to gross biomechanical factors, such as finger inertias. Herein, we show th at the dependence can arise from a neural circuit in which a predictive cen tral process and a slow sensory feedback process cooperate to control artic ulation. An oscillating neural network is first constructed as an extension of the vector-integration-to-endpoint (VITE) model for voluntary control o f movement. The resulting circuit exhibits volition-controlled oscillation rates. It also affords predictive control by continuously computing an inte rnal estimate of the remaining "time-to-contact" (TTC) with a targeted inte gration level, the reaching of which triggers the oscillator's next half cy cle. At fixed successive threshold values of this estimate of time remainin g in the current half cycle, the performer first launches keystroke n + 1 a nd then lifts keystroke n. As tempo slows, the time required to pass betwee n threshold crossings elongates, and KOT increases. However, if performers used only such a central process to control articulation, they would not sh ow the bend seen in the slow tempo region of the KOT vs. IOI function. The bend emerges if performers lift keystroke n whenever they cross the second internal threshold or receive sensory feedback from stroke n + 1, whichever comes earlier. Empirical estimates of feedback delay times are consistent with this interpretation.