Objective: Activity self-reports are a commonly used tool in assessing dail
y physical activity (PA) and associated energy expenditure (EE). This study
examined the effect of relative body fatness (%BF) on differences between
self-reported and measured duration and associated EE in healthy adults.
Research Methods and Procedures: Men and women (n = 115, age 38+/-9 years),
ranging in %BF from 7.9% to 58.9%, spent two separate days (normal and exe
rcise) in a whole-room indirect calorimeter where EE was measured. While in
the room calorimeter, subjects reported the type, intensity, and duration
of each performed PA. The Compendium of Physical Activity was used to calcu
late the energy cost of each reported activity. The EE of all self-reported
activities (EEr) was categorized into four intensity levels, synchronized,
and compared with EE from the room calorimeter (EEm).
Results: With increasing %BF, subjects significantly overestimated duration
of more strenuous activities (greater than or equal to 4.5), while underes
timating moderate activities (2.5 to 4.4 metabolic equivalents (METs)). Mis
reporting of duration and/or intensity caused an overestimation or underest
imation of PA-associated EE at these levels. Reported EE sleep was lower th
an measured EE sleep, although both had similar durations. As a result, tot
al EEr was similar to EEm.
Discussion: Individual variability of daily total PA and associated EE gene
rated from self-reports in adults is high. Persons with a higher %BF report
duration and/or intensity of moderate to high levels of PA with lower accu
racy than leaner individuals. We conclude using the Compendium of Physical
Activity is not suitable for the accurate estimation of self-reported EE of
AA in adults with a higher %BF.