Vc. Mow et al., The extracellular matrix, interstitial fluid and ions as a mechanical signal transducer in articular cartilage, OSTEO CART, 7(1), 1999, pp. 41-58
Objective: (1) Provide an overview of the biomechanical factors that are re
quired to analyze and interpret biological data from explant experiments; (
2) Present a description of some of the mechano-electrochemical events whic
h occur in cartilage explants during loading.
Design: A thorough and provocative discussion on the effects of loading on
articular cartilage will be presented. Five simplest loading cases are cons
idered: hydrostatic pressure, osmotic pressure, permeation (pressure loadin
g), confined compression and unconfined compression. Details of how such su
rface loadings are converted or transduced by the extracellular matrix (ECM
) to pressure, fluid, solute and ion flows, deformation and electrical fiel
ds are discussed.
Results: Similarities and differences in these quantities for the five type
s of loading are specifically noted. For example, it is noted that there is
no practical mechanical loading condition that can be achieved in the labo
ratory to produce effects that are equal to the effects of osmotic pressure
loading within the ECM. Some counter-intuitive effects from these loadings
are also described. Further, the significance of flow-induced compression
of the ECM is emphasized, since this frictional drag effect is likely to be
one of the major effects of fluid flow through the porous-permeable ECM. S
treaming potentials arising from the flow of ions past the fixed charges of
the ECM are discussed in relation to the flow-induced compaction effect as
well.
Conclusion: Understanding the differences among these explant loading cases
is important; it will help to provide greater insights to the mechano-elec
trochemical events which mediate metabolic responses of chondrocytes in exp
lant loading experiments.