A veridical estimate of viewing distance is required in order to determine
the metric structure of objects from binocular stereopsis. One example of a
judgment of metric structure, which we used in our experiment, is the appa
rently circular cylinder task (E B Johnston, 1991 Vision Research 31 1351-1
360). Most studies report underconstancy in this task when the stimulus is
defined purely by binocular disparities.
We examined the effect of two factors on performance: (i) the richness of t
he cues to viewing distance (using either a naturalistic setting with many
cues to viewing distance or a condition in which the room and the monitors
were obscured from view), and (ii) the range of stimulus disparities (cylin
der depths) presented during an experimental run. We tested both experience
d subjects (who had performed the task many times before under full-cue con
ditions) and naive subjects.
Depth constancy was reduced for the naive subjects (from 62% to 46%) when t
he position of the monitors was obscured. Under similar conditions, the exp
erienced subjects showed no reduction in constancy. In a second experiment,
using a forced-choice method of constant stimuli, we found that depth cons
tancy was reduced from 64% to 23% in naive subjects and from 77% to 55% in
experienced subjects when the same set of images was presented at all viewi
ng distances rather than using a set of stimulus disparities proportional t
o the correct setting.
One possible explanation of these results is that, under reduced-cue condit
ions, the range of disparities presented is used by the visual system as a
cue to viewing distance.