Cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets that differed fr
om the distracters along two dimensions (color and orientation) was compare
d with intradimensional search for targets that differed from the distracte
rs along a single dimension (either orientation or color). The design of th
e first three experiments differed from those of previous studies in that p
articipants were required to respond differently to each of the targets. Ex
periments 1-3 were similar except that in Experiment 1, the distractors wer
e homogeneous; in Experiment 2, two types of distracters were used in equal
proportions; and in Experiment 3, two types of distracters were used but o
ne of the distracters was a singleton. The findings, contrary to those of p
revious studies, revealed that cross-dimensional search is at least as effi
cient and for some targets even more efficient than intradimensional search
. These results suggest that the details of stimulus-to-response mapping ar
e essential in comparing intra- and cross-dimensional tasks. Experiment 4 u
sed a priming design and did not support an explanation based on grouping p
rocesses. We outline an explanation for all the findings based on a recent
cross-dimensional response selection model by Cohen and Shoup (1997).