Absorbed dose beam quality correction factors k(Q) for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV photon beam

Citation
H. Palmans et al., Absorbed dose beam quality correction factors k(Q) for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV photon beam, PHYS MED BI, 44(3), 1999, pp. 647-663
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00319155 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
647 - 663
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9155(199903)44:3<647:ADBQCF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Dose to water(D-W) determination in clinical high-energy photon beams with ionization chambers calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water has been proposed as an alternative to ionization chamber dosimetry based on air ker ma calibrations. D-W in the clinical beam is derived using a k(Q) factor th at scales the absorbed dose calibration factor in the reference beam to the absorbed dose calibration factor in the user beam. In the present study k(Q) values were determined for the NE2571 chamber in a 5 MV and a 10 MV high-energy photon beam generated at the 15 MeV high-int ensity electron linac of the University of Gent. A set of three NE2571 cham bers was calibrated relative to the Gent sealed water calorimeter both in C o-60 and in the linac beam at a depth of 5 cm and a source to detector dist ance of 100 cm. Two high-purity chemical water systems were used in the det ection vessel of the calorimeter, H-2-saturated and Ar-saturated pure water , which are both supposed to give a zero heat defect. TPR1020 and %dd(10) h ave been evaluated as beam quality specifiers. Simulations using the BEAM/D OSXYZ Monte Carlo system were performed to evaluate potential corrections o n the measured beam qualities. The average k(Q) values measured for the three NE2571 chambers in the 5 MV and 10 MV photon beams are 0.995 +/- 0.005 and 0.979 +/- 0.005 respectively . For the three chambers used, the maximum deviation of individual k(Q) val ues is 0.2%. The measured beam quality specifiers %dd(10) and TPR1020 are 6 7.0 and 0.705 for the 5 MV beam and 75.0 and 0.759 for the 10 MV beam. Alth ough our beam design is very different from those used by other investigato rs for the measurement of k(Q) values, the agreement with their results is satisfactory showing a slightly better agreement when %dd(10) is used as th e beam quality specifier.