While there is widespread public and political support for cleaning up the
nation's hazardous waste sites, Superfund has been fraught with dissension
and controversy since its inception. Some criticisms of the program focus o
n deriding an all-too-expensive program run amuck with litigation and feder
al heavy-handedness. Other critics complain of an inefficient and ineffecti
ve program that has mode painfully slow and inconsistent progress. Detracto
rs do not disagree with the fundamental goal of the program-cleaning up haz
ardous waste sites. Rather, they focus on the fairness of Superfund's liabi
lity provisions and the Environmental Protection Agency's record of cleanup
competency. This paper discusses these major issues at the core of the con
troversy over Superfund. The policy implications of Superfund program refor
m efforts and the ramifications for future hazardous waste policy are consi
dered.