The vast majority of cases of eosinophilia in North America are caused by a
llergic processes. In individual cases, a short differential diagnosis of t
he most likely causes can be formulated on the basis of the absolute eosino
phil count. The extensive laboratory workup previously recommended by some
authorities is probably not justified unless detailed history taking and ph
ysical examination indicated a need for specific investigations. Although t
he possibility of missing an occult neoplasm has been used to justify exten
sive investigation, this is usually not necessary because most tumor-associ
ated eosinophilia is accompanied by widely metastatic disease. History taki
ng should emphasize the possibility of drug-induced or helminth-associated
eosinophilia. If the history indicates travel, dietary or other exposure ri
sks, stool examination for ova and parasites is worthwhile. If a possible a
llergic cause is suspected, testing for evidence of atopy may be performed
concomitantly with testing for parasitic infection. A follow-up white blood
cell count with differential is recommended to ascertain whether eosinophi
lia has resolved. When an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1.5 x 10-d
egrees/L persists for longer than 6 months, idopathic hypereosinophilic syn
drome must be ruled out.