Inconsistent findings have repeatedly been found by researchers attempting
to determine whether the computer form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Persona
lity Inventory (MMPI) is psychometrically equivalent to the booklet form. T
his article applied psychometric meta-analysis to pool results from all ava
ilable studies to examine the equivalence: of the computer and booklet MMPI
forms. Means, standard deviations, and crossform correlations were cumulat
ed. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature demonstrated that the d
isparate findings can be explained in terms of sampling error across indivi
dual studies. Differences in means and standard deviations across studies w
ere near 0, and crossform rank orderings were near perfect. The results of
this study suggest that the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI are psyc
hometrically equivalent.