Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) interacts with t
hree types of PACAP/VIP-receptors. The PAC(1)-receptor accepts PACAP as a h
igh affinity ligand but not vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) similarly b
inding to VPAC(1)- and VPAC(2)-receptors. To identify those amino acids not
present in VIP defining PAC(1)-receptor selectivity of PACAP, radio recept
or binding assays on AR4-2J cells were performed. It could be shown that PA
CAP(1-27) exhibited a distinct and much higher susceptibility to VIP-amino
acid substitutions, compared to PACAP(1-38). Positions 4 and 5 seem to be m
ost important fur receptor binding of PACAP(1-27), whereas position 13 was
identified to be crucial for maximal affinity of PACAP(1-38). PACAP(29-38)
extension analogues of VIP revealed a stabilizing effect of the C-terminus
of PACAP(1-38) on the optimal peptide conformation. The substitution analog
ues were also checked for their capacity to stimulate IP3 and cAMP formatio
n in AR4-2J cells. Compared to PACAP(1-27) and PACAP(1-38), most analogues
revealed potencies reduced congruously to their lower binding affinities. H
owever, one of the analogues, PACAP(1-27) substituted in position 5, may re
present a weak antagonist since this peptide was less potent in inducing se
cond messengers than in label displacement. Our findings indicate that PACA
P(1-27) and PACAP(1-38) differ in terms of their requirement of the amino a
cids in positions 4, 5, 9, 11 and 13 for maximal interaction with the PAC(1
)-receptor. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.