Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees

Citation
Rm. Hubbard et al., Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees, TREE PHYSL, 19(3), 1999, pp. 165-172
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
TREE PHYSIOLOGY
ISSN journal
0829318X → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
165 - 172
Database
ISI
SICI code
0829-318X(199903)19:3<165:ETHCLP>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We tested the hypotheses that hydraulic conductance is lower in old (about 250 years old and 30 m tall) compared to young (about 40 years old and 10 m tall) Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws. trees and that lower hydraulic condu ctance of old trees limits their photosynthesis. Hydraulic conductance at t he end of summer 1995, calculated from leaf water potential and leaf gas ex change measurements on one-year-old needles, was 44% lower in old trees com pared to young trees growing in a mixed age-class stand on the east slope o f the Oregon Cascades. Whole-tree sapflow per unit leaf area averaged 53% l ower in old trees compared to young trees and mean hydraulic conductance ca lculated from sapflow and water potential data was 63% lower in old trees t han in young trees. For the entire summer, stomatal conductance (g(s)) and assimilation (A) declined more steeply with air saturation deficit (D) in o ld trees than in young trees. For both old and young trees, mean g(s) and A were approximately 32 and 21% lower, respectively, at typical midday D val ues (2.5-3.0 kPa). We hypothesized that if hydraulic conductance limits g(s ), and A, then increasing or decreasing the leaf specific conductance of a branch will result in proportional changes in the responses of g(s), and A with D. Removal of 50% of the foliage from a set of experimental branches o n old trees caused g(s), and A to decline less steeply with D in early summ er, but values were not significantly different from control values in late summer. Cutting transverse notches in branches on young trees had no effec t on the responses of g(s), and A with D. Leaf nitrogen content and photosy nthetic capacity were similar suggesting that differences in g(s), and A be tween old and young trees were not caused by differences in photosynthetic capacity.