Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting - Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome

Citation
Im. Zardawi et al., Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting - Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome, ACT CYTOL, 43(2), 1999, pp. 163-168
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ACTA CYTOLOGICA
ISSN journal
00015547 → ACNP
Volume
43
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
163 - 168
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-5547(199903/04)43:2<163:UFNACO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cyt ology in a multidisciplinary setting in rural Australia and to compare the imaging (mammographic and and ultrasound) appearances and cytomorphologic f indings with the final outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of ultrasound-guided FNA cytology result s front 426 women, aged 40-86 years, with screening-detected mammographic a bnormalities. Cases of microcalcification, assessed mainly by stereotactati c core biopsy, were not included in the study. The FNAs were performed at a rural breast screening and assessment program in New South Wales, Australi a, over a three-year period between May 1993 and May 1996. RESULTS: Imaging, FNA and combined imaging and FNA results from 426 women w ere as follows. The imaging diagnoses included 176 (41%) benign, 34 (8%) pr obably benign, 17 (4%) equivocal, 104 (24%) suspicious and 95 (23%) maligna nt cases. The FNA findings showed 59 (14%) no epithelial cells seen (nondia gnostic), 175 (41%) benign 36 (8%) atypical, 41 (10%) suspicious and 115 (2 7%) malignant. Combined imaging and cytologic results comprised 224 (52.6%) benign, 10 (2.3%) atypical/equivocal, 59 (13.9%) suspicious and 133 (31.2% ) malignant cases. All the malignant cases, by combined assessment, had mal ignant histology, and all the benign cases behaved in a benign fashion. In 80% of the suspicious lesions, the histologic diagnosis was malignant, but only 10% of the atypical/equivocal lesions had malignant histology. The pos itive predictive value of diagnosis of malignancy by combined imaging and F NA was 100%, and the false negative rate was 0%. CONCLUSION: Despite the recent surge in the population of core biopsy, FNA cytology of impalpable, mammographically detected lesions, when practiced i n a multidisciplinary setting, is an extremely accurate test with high sens itivity, specificity, predictive values and efficacy. FNA cytology of the b reast is a well-tolerated, relatively noninvasive test with a very low risk of complications. The sensitivity and positive predictive values for malig nant and suspicious mammographic categories are also very high.