OBJECTIVE: Investigators suggest three distinct pathophysiologies for patie
nts with constipation symptoms: 1) slow colon transit, 2) irritable bowel s
yndrome (IBS), and 3) pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Our aim was to determ
ine the prevalence of the three types of constipation pathophysiology, the
degree of overlap, and what interactions exist between pathophysiologies.
METHODS: Constipated patients refractory to fiber (n = 131) underwent regio
nal colon transit studies, anorectal manometry/EMG, measurement of rectal c
ompliance, and rectal sensory testing. Correlations were performed examinin
g interactions between the above measures.
RESULTS: Visceral hypersensitivity (typical of IBS) was found in 58%, slow
colonic transit in 47%, PFD in 59%, and no physiological abnormalities were
detected in 24%. Slow transit and visceral hypersensitivity overlapped in
half of each group. PFD physiology was found in approximately half of each
of the subgroups. There was no correlation between PFD physiology and recto
sigmoid transit, total colon transit, or any other physiology. There were n
o correlations between slow transit and visceral hypersensitivity. Visceral
hypersensitivity did correlate with increased rectal compliance, suggestiv
e of increased accommodation reflexes in IBS.
CONCLUSIONS: At a tertiary center, slow transit physiology and visceral hyp
ersensitivity typical of IBS are equally common and overlap heavily in cons
tipated patients. PFD physiology does not correlate with slower rectosigmoi
d colon transit, and is seen equally in all subgroups. No abnormalities wer
e found in 24% of patients. We therefore identify four subgroups in constip
ation: IBS, slow transit, both, and neither. (Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:60
9-615. (C) 1999 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology).