Measuring quality of life in dyspeptic patients: Development and validation of a new specific health status questionnaire - Final report from the Italian QPD Project involving 4000 patients
F. Bamfi et al., Measuring quality of life in dyspeptic patients: Development and validation of a new specific health status questionnaire - Final report from the Italian QPD Project involving 4000 patients, AM J GASTRO, 94(3), 1999, pp. 730-738
OBJECTIVE: Despite the fact that gastrointestinal disorders represent one o
f the most common reasons for medical consultations, formal assessment of p
atients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been carried out only i
n a few studies, and in most cases generic questionnaires have been adopted
. Because the specific issue of living with dyspeptic problems has been add
ressed in very few cases and no questionnaire has been shown to be appropri
ate for the Italian setting, a prospective project was launched to develop
a specific HRQOL questionnaire for dyspepsia sufferers tailored to Italian
patients but also appropriate in other cultural settings.
METHODS: The project consisted in a 3-yr, three-phase survey, in which diff
erent versions of the quality of life in peptic disease questionnaire (QPD)
were developed through expert and patient focus groups and empiric field s
tudies and then administered to patients recruited in five multicenter stud
ies. Standard psychometric techniques were used to evaluate the validity, r
eliability, responsiveness, and patient acceptability of the QPD.
RESULTS: Three different versions of the QPD questionnaire were self-admini
stered to more than 4000 patients. The final 30-item version, measuring thr
ee health concepts related to dyspeptic disease (anxiety induced by pain, s
ocial restriction, symptom perception), fulfilled the recommended psychomet
ric criteria in terms of reliability and validity, correlated with health c
oncepts measured with a well-known independent generic HRQOL instrument (th
e SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire) and was relatively invariant to diagno
sis and sociodemographic variables; it also correlated with a measure of ga
stric pain frequency and was able to detect meaningful differences over tim
e.
CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation studies in different cultural and
linguistic settings are mandatory before any firm conclusions can be drawn
regarding the crosscultural validity of the QPD, the data obtained provide
evidence of the psychometric validity and robustness of the questionnaire w
hen used in a fairly large, well-characterized population of Italian dyspep
tic patients. (Am J Gastroenterol 1999;93:730-738. (C) 1999 by Am. Coll. of
Gastroenterology).