The effects of biofeedback on rectal sensation and distal colonic motilityin patients with disorders of rectal evacuation - Evidence of an inhibitory rectocolonic reflex in humans?
Rmhg. Mollen et al., The effects of biofeedback on rectal sensation and distal colonic motilityin patients with disorders of rectal evacuation - Evidence of an inhibitory rectocolonic reflex in humans?, AM J GASTRO, 94(3), 1999, pp. 751-756
OBJECTIVE: Abnormalities of descending colon motility reported in a subset
of patients with rectal evacuation disorders are consistent with a rectocol
onic inhibitory reflex. Our aims were to evaluate distal colon motor functi
on and rectal sensation in such patients and assess effects of biofeedback
(BF) training on these functions.
METHODS: Seven patients (five women, two men; mean age 36 yr) with rectal e
vacuation disorders were studied before and after 10-days biofeedback train
ing; six healthy volunteers (five women, one man; mean age 30 yr) were stud
ied once. Colonic compliance, motility, sensation thresholds, and perceptio
n scores during standardized rectal distentions were measured using two bar
ostat-manometry assemblies inserted into the cleansed colon with the aid of
flexible sigmoidoscopy.
RESULTS: Sigmoid compliance, fasting, and postprandial motility index, and
perception thresholds were similar in controls and patients before and afte
r biofeedback training. Postprandial sigmoid tone tended (p = 0.09) to be l
ower in patients than controls; after biofeedback, postprandial tone was co
mparable to that in controls. Rectal urgency scores at 24 mm Hg distention
were greater in patients than in controls (p = 0.02 for both). After biofee
dback, there were trends for lower perceptions of urgency to defecate (7.6
+/- 1.1 cm pre- vs 5.3 +/- 1.5 post-; p = 0.04) at 24 mm Hg; conversely, ga
s sensation at 12 mm Hg was higher (1.2 +/- 0.5 cm pre- vs 3.3 +/- 0.6 post
-; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of rectal evacuation and postprandial sigmoid to
ne in patients with evacuation disorders by biofeedback training supports t
he presence of a rectocolonic inhibitory reflex. Effect of biofeedback on r
ectal sensation in these patients requires further study. (Am J Gastroenter
ol 1999;94:751-756. (C) 1999 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology).