Incorporating clinical outcomes and economic consequences into drug formulary decisions: A practical approach

Citation
Db. Mather et al., Incorporating clinical outcomes and economic consequences into drug formulary decisions: A practical approach, AM J M CARE, 5(3), 1999, pp. 277-285
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
ISSN journal
10880224 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
277 - 285
Database
ISI
SICI code
1088-0224(199903)5:3<277:ICOAEC>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Background: In 1994, Regence BlueShield (Regence), a large non-staff model health plan, adopted guidelines governing the review of new and existing dr ug products. However, certain limitations were apparent: adequate data were not available in a timely fashion; unpublished studies and information on unapproved indications were difficult to obtain; data addressing humanistic and economic outcomes were not routinely supplied by manufacturers; and th e time required by Regence staff clinical pharmacists to assemble and summa rize published clinical studies for the pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) com mittee was excessive; Objective: To describe the process used by Regence to collect and review cl inical, economic, and other health outcomes data as part of the plan's drug formulary adoption process. Process Description: To address these limitations, Regence revised its proc ess to require pharmaceutical manufacturers to submit a detailed dossier wi th clinical and economic data from published and unpublished studies, along with a disease-based economic model projecting the potential impact that i ntroducing the product would have on health outcomes and economic consequen ces occurring across the entire Regence system. After performing independen t literature reviews to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the in formation obtained, clinical pharmacists at Regence complete a detailed sum mary of each drug for the P&T committee. Conclusion: The new process has addressed the limitations of the previous s ystem and, by improving the timeliness and relevance of available informati on, it supports Regence's goal of maintaining an evidence-based formulary.