Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: Follow-up until 10 years postretention

Citation
Ea. Al Yami et al., Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: Follow-up until 10 years postretention, AM J ORTHOD, 115(3), 1999, pp. 300-304
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS
ISSN journal
08895406 → ACNP
Volume
115
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
300 - 304
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-5406(199903)115:3<300:SOOTOF>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Dental casts of 1016 patients were evaluated for the long-term treatment ou tcome using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. The PAR index was measu red at the pretreatment stage (n = 1016), directly posttreatment (n = 783), postretention (n = 942), 2 years postretention (n = 781), 5 years postrete ntion (n = 821), and 10 years postretention (n = 564). The mean absolute ch ange as well as the percentage of change per year (relapse) related to the postretention stage was calculated. An analysis of variance was applied to compare the mean change in the PAR between cases with and without a fixed r etainer at the postretention stage and up to 10 years postretention. Drop-o ut analysis showed that more Class II Division 2 cases were lost to follow- up than cases of other Angle classes. The results indicate that 67% of the achieved orthodontic treatment result was maintained 10 years postretention . About half of the total relapse (as measured with the PAR index) takes pl ace in the first 2 years after retention. All occlusal traits relapsed grad ually over time but remained stable from 5 years postretention with the exc eption of the lower anterior contact point displacement, which showed a fas t and continuous increase even exceeding the initial score. The presence of a fixed retainer had a positive effect on the PAR score. In cases with fix ed retention, the relapse was 3.6 PAR points less at 5 years postretention and 4.6 points less at 10 years postretention. The results of this type of studies enable clinicians to inform their patients about treatment limitati ons in order to better meet their expectations.