M. Cachovan et al., Randomized reliability study evaluating constant-load and graded-exercise treadmill test for intermittent claudication, ANGIOLOGY, 50(3), 1999, pp. 193-200
The aim of this randomized study was to compare the reliability of the trea
dmill test at constant-load (C-test, 3 km/hr; fixed grade of 12%) recommend
ed in Germany with that of the graded-exercise test (G-test, 3 km/hr; incre
ase in grade of 3.5% every 3 minutes) propagated in the United States.
In 50 patients with an absolute claudication distance (ACD) in the C-test o
f between 50 and 400 m, the two treadmill tests were carried out in randomi
zed order on one and the same day, and repeated on 3 days within 1 week. Fo
r the initial claudication distance (ICD), the intraclass correlation was 0
.88 in the C-test and 0.87 in the G-test. For the ACD the coefficients were
identical at 0.91. The within-subject variation (CVwithin) in the C-test a
nd G-test was 25% and 27% for the ICD and for the ACD 24% and 21%, respecti
vely. The between-subject variation was very similar with 72% and 73% (ICD)
and with 78% and 68% (ACD). However, in ACDs below 100 m and between 100 t
o 150 m, the C-test showed significantly smaller coefficients of variation
than the G-test: 13% vs 81% and 14% vs 50%, respectively. In conclusion, th
e results showed that both C-test and G-test are equally well reproducible.