Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma -A randomized, controlled trial

Citation
K. Malmstrom et al., Oral montelukast, inhaled beclomethasone, and placebo for chronic asthma -A randomized, controlled trial, ANN INT MED, 130(6), 1999, pp. 487
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00034819 → ACNP
Volume
130
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(19990316)130:6<487:OMIBAP>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background: Oral leukotriene receptor antagonists have been shown to have e fficacy in chronic asthma. Objective: To compare the clinical benefit of montelukast, a once-daily ora l leukotriene receptor antagonist; placebo; and inhaled beclomethasone. Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, paralle l-group, 12-week study. Setting: 36 sites worldwide. Patients: 895 patients 15 to 85 years of age with chronic asthma and an FEV , 50% to 85% of predicted. Interventions: Montelukast, 10 mg once daily at bedtime; inhaled beclometha sone, 200 mu g twice daily, administered with a spacer device; or placebo. Measurements: Primary end points were daytime asthma symptom score and FEV1 . Secondary end points were peak expiratory flow rates in the morning and e vening, as-needed beta-agonist use, nocturnal awakenings, asthma-specific q uality of life, and worsening asthma episodes. Results: Over the 12-week treatment period, the average percentage change f rom baseline in FEV1 was 13.1% with beclomethasone, 7.4% with montelukast, and 0.7% with placebo (P < 0.001 for each active treatment compared with pl acebo; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with montelukast). The average change from baseline in daytime symptom score was -0.62 for beclomethasone, -0.41 for montelukast, and -0.17 for placebo (P < 0.001 for each active tr eatment compared with placebo; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with mo ntelukast). Each agent improved peak expiratory flow rates and quality of l ife, reduced nocturnal awakenings and asthma attacks, increased the number of asthma-control days, and decreased the number of days with asthma exacer bations (P < 0.001 for each active treatment compared with placebo for each end point; P < 0.01 for beclomethasone compared with montelukast for each end point). Although beclomethasone had a greater mean clinical benefit tha n montelukast, montelukast had a faster onset of action and a greater initi al effect. The two agents caused similar decreases in peripheral blood eosi nophil counts (P < 0.05 for each agent compared with placebo). Both agents had tolerability profiles similar to that of placebo over the 12-week study . Conclusions: Although beclomethasone had a larger mean effect than monteluk ast, both drugs provided clinical benefit to patients with chronic asthma. This finding is consistent with the use of these agents as controller medic ations for chronic asthma.