The present study was an attempt to examine the relationship between the We
chsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R; Wechsler, 1987) and the Memory Assessme
nt Scale (MAS; Williams, 1991). The sample consisted of 51 patients referre
d for neuropsychological examination. Average age was 55.29 (SD = 20.94). A
verage education was 11.94 years (SD = 3.18). Average Full Scale le was 94.
75 (SD = 15.44). The results showed that no MAS index correlated higher tha
n .60 with any of the WMS-R indices. There was minimal specific prediction
between instruments across each memory domain. Agreement between the tests
clinically was low as well. Corrections for such factors as age, education,
intelligence or diagnosis lowered the relationships between the tests alth
ough not significantly. Corrections to the correlations for the inherent re
liability of each test increased correlations between the tests but still r
esulted in a maximum common variance of 56% (for the visual measures) down
to 40% (for General Memory). These results are consistent with the argument
that "general memory" is not as useful a construct as that of "general int
elligence" and that these tests of general memory measure different underly
ing constructs. This has important impact on how we conceive and report mem
ory test results. (C) 1999 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published b
y Elsevier Science Ltd.