Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services

Citation
S. Barclay et al., Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services, BR J GEN PR, 49(440), 1999, pp. 181-186
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
ISSN journal
09601643 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
440
Year of publication
1999
Pages
181 - 186
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-1643(199903)49:440<181:PCGCOS>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background. General practitioners (GPs) have become more responsible for bu dget allocation over the years. The 1997 White Paper has signalled major ch anges in GPs' roles in commissioning. In general, palliative care is ranked as a high priority and such services are therefore likely to be early cand idates for commissioning. Aim. To examine the different commissioning priorities within the primary h ealth care team (PHCT) by ascertaining the views of GPs and district nurses (DNs) concerning their priorities for the future planning of local palliat ive care services and the adequacy of services as currently provided. Method. A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 167 GP principals and 96 registered DNs in the Cambridge area to ascertain ratings of service develo pment priority and service adequacy, for which written comments were receiv ed. Results. Replies were received from 141 (84.4%) GPs and 86 (90%) DNs. B oth professional groups agreed that the most important service developments were urgent hospice admission for symptom control or terminal care, and Ma rie Curie nurses. GPs gave greater priority than DNs to specialist doctor h ome visits and Macmillan nurses. DNs gave greater priority than GPs to Mari e Curie nurses, hospital-at-home, non-cancer patients' urgent hospice admis sion, day care, and hospice outpatients. For each of the eight services whe re significant differences were found in perceptions of service adequacy, D Ns rated the service to be less adequate than GPs. Conclusion. The 1997 White Paper, The New NHS, has indicated that the vario us forms of GP purchasing are to be replaced by primary care groups (PCGs), in which both GPs and DNs are to be involved in commissioning decisions. F or many palliative care services, DNs' views of service adequacy and priori ties for future development differ significantly from their GP colleagues; resolution of these differences will need to be attained within PCGs. Both professional groups give high priority to the further development of quick- response clinical services, especially urgent hospice admission and Marie C urie nurses.