Intermediate-dose intravenous melphalan and blood stem cells mobilized with sequential GM+G-CSF or G-CSF alone to treat AL (amyloid light chain) amyloidosis
Rl. Comenzo et al., Intermediate-dose intravenous melphalan and blood stem cells mobilized with sequential GM+G-CSF or G-CSF alone to treat AL (amyloid light chain) amyloidosis, BR J HAEM, 104(3), 1999, pp. 553-559
AL amyloidosis patients ineligible for dose-intensive melphalan (200 mg/m(2
)) were enrolled on a phase II trial to be treated with two cycles of inter
mediate-dose melphalan (IDM 100 mg/m(2)) and mobilized blood stern cells (B
SC), For mobilization patients were randomized to either GM-CSF 250 mu g/m(
2) for 3 d followed by G-CSF 10 mu g/ kg for 3 d (GM+G), or G-CSF 10 mu g/k
g for 6 d (G-alone), with leukaphereses on days 5, 6 and 7. To minimize mor
bidity, we planned to support each cycle with 3.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg
and had a collection target of 7x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Those who did not
achieve the target were treated with one cycle of IDM. 30 patients, a media
n of 62 years old and 7 months from diagnosis, were enrolled. Both mobiliza
tion regimens were generally well tolerated, and similar in terms of CD34() cells and CFU-GM collected, but only 6/28 patients achieved the collectio
n target (GM+G four, G-alone two). Despite a 19% incidence of grade 4 toxic
ities, IDM therapy was well tolerated. At a median follow-up of 24 months (
19-36) 57% of patients had survived, 17% with durable complete haematologic
al responses and 40% with improved or stable amyloid organ involvement, inc
luding 3/9 patients with predominant cardiac amyloid who are alive 2-3 year
s after treatment. The 100 d mortality was 20%. In conclusion, no definitiv
e differences were identified between the mobilization regimens and IDM was
an active regimen in AL for selected patients.