Radial force of coronary stents: A comparative analysis

Citation
R. Rieu et al., Radial force of coronary stents: A comparative analysis, CATHET C IN, 46(3), 1999, pp. 380-391
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
ISSN journal
15221946 → ACNP
Volume
46
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
380 - 391
Database
ISI
SICI code
1522-1946(199903)46:3<380:RFOCSA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
High radial force has become an essential feature of new coronary stents. T hese stents are expected to exhibit sufficient radial force and minimum rad ial recoil when deployed in atheromatous lesions of various morphologies. T he aim of this study was to compare the radial force of II coronary stents in vitro (Anglodynamics, ACS Multilink, AVE Micro II and GFX, Bard XT, Bioc ompatibles PC, Cook GR II, Cordis Crossflex, Hexacath Freedom, Johnson & Jo hnson PS 153'PS 154, and Crown, Medtronic Wiktor and BeStent BEL-15, Saint- Come SC 1616, Scimed Nir 7 and 9). Two in vitro mechanical tests were perfo rmed to assess the stent radial force. The first test measured the deformat ion of coronary stents in a V-stand by using a deformation controlled by a dynamometer based on a longitudinal generatrix. The precision was of 1 micr on. This comparative test highlighted the appreciable variation in behavior of the range of tested stents in terms of resistance to local compression. The line graphs obtained show a very small (and in some cases nonexistent) purely elastic behavior area in the stents, with this result reflecting a small (<0.4 Newtons) range of forces applied to all stents. Above this valu e, the stents did not return to their size before compression and the line graph remains approximately linear for a long period. It was therefore poss ible to distinguish between two families of stents on the basis of the pres ence or absence of this elastic area. In the second test, the stent was dep loyed in a 3.0-mm elastic tube and a pressure gradient created between the interior and exterior of the tube. The precision was of 50 microns. A typic al line graph of the pressure-diameter relationship was recognizable for a given stent. No difference in behavior between the different coronary stent s was noted up to 0.3 x 10(5) Pa; subsequently, after 0.3 x 10(5) Pa, sizab le deformation differences were Visible between the least resistant stent, the BeStent BEL-15, and the most resistant stent, the Crossflex. (C) 1999 W iley-Liss, Inc.