Objective: Although the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain inventory (MP
I) is frequently used in clinical evaluation and research with chronic pain
patients, few studies have reported item-level factor analyses. After perf
orming such an analysis, Bernstein et al. (Spine 1995;20;956-63) reported L
ock of independence between the solicitous and distracting response scales
in section II as well as the activities away from home and social activitie
s scales in section III. They suggested that the combination of these scale
s would improve the internal structure of the MPI. The purpose of this stud
y was to perform a confirmatory factor analysis testing whether the MPI wou
ld he improved by the consolidation of these scales. In addition, a third,
empirical model was generated for comparison with the West Haven-Yale and B
ernstein models.
Design: This study used exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis on two
independent samples of chronic pain patients (n = 472 and n = 346) to test
hypotheses regarding the factor structure of the MPI.
Results and Conclusion: Principal axis factor analysis resulted in an empir
ical modal that suggested that the primary psychometric problem of the MPI
was lack of item-factor discrimination for several items. When the three mo
dels were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, improvement in model f
it occurred when cross loading items were excluded. Nevertheless, the goodn
ess of fit of original factor structure wets adequate, suggesting it would
be premature to suggest changes in this instrument.