Objective: To assess the influence of muscular fatigue on active and passiv
e shoulder proprioception within the midrange of rotation.
Design: A randomized controlled, before-and-after design.
Setting: Neuromuscular research laboratory.
Participants: Twenty recreationally active men (mean age, 23.81 +/- 2.77 ye
ars) were randomly assigned to either a control or a fatigue group. Exclusi
on criteria were any history of upper extremity injury or pathology, cardio
vascular disease, or disease affecting the sensory system.
Intervention: Shoulder proprioception was assessed by active reproduction o
f passive positioning (ARPP), active reproduction of active positioning (AR
AP), reproduction of passive positioning (RPP), and threshold to detect pas
sive motion (TTDPM). For each test direction, the experimental group perfor
med two bouts of maximal reciprocal concentric isokinetic internal and exte
rnal contractions at 180 degrees/s until peak torque decreased to 50% of th
e established maximum voluntary contraction. After two bouts of the fatigue
protocol, subjects were randomly assessed for proprioception into internal
or external rotation.
Main Outcome Measures: The absolute angular error for active and passive pr
oprioception was measured on the Biodex System II Isokinetic Dynamometer (B
iodex Medical Inc., Shirley, NY, U.S.A.) and a proprioception testing devic
e, respectively.
Main Results: A two-factor repeated measures analysis of variance revealed
no significant interactions between the experimental and control groups for
ARPP, ARAP, RPP, or TTDPM.
Conclusions: Shoulder proprioception was not affected by the short-duration
, high-intensity protocol used in this study. This may be due to the lack o
f an extended recovery period observed with this type of fatigue regimen.