Measurement of measles virus-specific neutralizing antibodies: Evaluation of the syncytium inhibition assay in comparison with the plaque reduction neutralization test
Bj. Ward et al., Measurement of measles virus-specific neutralizing antibodies: Evaluation of the syncytium inhibition assay in comparison with the plaque reduction neutralization test, DIAG MICR I, 33(3), 1999, pp. 147-152
Plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) is the "gold-standard" for the measur
ement of measles-specific neutralizing antibodies. However, it is a complic
ated assay and tends to be operator-dependent. It has been suggested that t
he simpler syncytium inhibition assay (SIA) can give results comparable to
the PRN test. We compared these two assays using 544 serum or plasma sample
s obtained from children at various times after natural infection, primary
measles immunization, and measles revaccination. The results of the two ass
ays correlated well overall (r = .86; p < 0.0001). The strain of challenge
virus (wild-type versus vaccine strain) did not significantly influence SIA
titers and the assay performed equally well with serum and plasma. PRN tit
ers greater than or equal to 120 and >800 are thought to indicate protectio
n against clinical illness and infection respectively. The equivalent SIA c
ut-off values using 125 plaque-forming units as the challenge inoculum were
greater than or equal to 16 and >128 respectively. At low PRN titers (<200
), the correlation between PRN and SIA values was reasonable (r = 0.60; p <
0.001) when a challenge inoculum of 12.5 plaque-forming units was used. At
the lowest PRN titers (<100), 15% of the samples gave divergent results. T
hese data confirm the utility of the SIA in the determination of measles-sp
ecific neutralizing antibodies when antibody titers are high. However, the
PRN assay remains the test of choice when maximum sensitivity at low titers
is required. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.