A comparison of western and eastern nuclear reactor pressure vessel steels

Authors
Citation
Lm. Davies, A comparison of western and eastern nuclear reactor pressure vessel steels, INT J PRES, 76(3), 1999, pp. 163-208
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Mechanical Engineering
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING
ISSN journal
03080161 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
163 - 208
Database
ISI
SICI code
0308-0161(199903)76:3<163:ACOWAE>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The task was essentially to compare the irradiation response of 'East' and 'West' steels. Since the plates and forgings of pressure vessels must be we lded together, it is obvious that the strength requirements of the welds an d heat affected zones (HAZ) can be no less demanding than those of the plat es and the forgings themselves, particularly as experience has shown that t he most likely location for flaws is in the welds or their HAZs. These and the highly stressed regions of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) are import ant because neutron irradiation degrades the mechanical properties of steel s. After comparing the various designs, manufacture and materials of the vario us RPVs, a comparison was made of the irradiation response of these differe nt steels. The role of mitigating the change in mechanical properties on ir radiation by thermal annealing was also considered. Particular codes/guides could only be used for the predicting results underpinning their own datab ase because a major difference between these national codes/guides is that the elements conferring irradiation sensitivity are different for the two c ases considered, i.e. Russian codes [1] (PNAE G-7-002-86) and the USNRC gui de [2] (RG 1.99 Rev. 2). In the former, copper and phosphorus are significa nt, while copper and nickel are identified as significant in the latter cas e. Predictions were compared for 'real' materials used in NPPPVs whose composi tions were known. The irradiation response of these steels is coincidentall y similar. The essential difference in behaviour is in the lifetime fluence . Eastern steels are irradiated to a much higher fluence than Western steel s. Differences in the predictions of the Eastern-Western codes/guides are a reflection of differences in the concentration of deleterious elements and pessimisms of the various codes/guides, particularly at low concentrations of deleterious elements where they are most conservative. Thirdly, and on a 'fitness for purpose' basis, the shift in transition temperature produces a Limitation to the lifetime of the earlier Eastern RPVs. However, by ther mally annealing the RPV to mitigate the effect of neutron irradiation, wher e the conditions to recover the mechanical properties of both Eastern and W estern steels are nearly the same, the operational life of these older East ern plants has been extended. Life assurance of these plants has, therefore , become practicable. This aspect of RPV technology, which is currently being considered in the U S, could extend the operational life of nuclear power plants and thereby re duce the cost of the electricity generated. (C) 1999 Commission of the Euro pean Communities. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.