Nf. Ray et al., Direct expenditures for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in 1996, including the contributions of related airway illnesses, J ALLERG CL, 103(3), 1999, pp. 401-407
Background: Previous estimates of the national economic burden of allergic
rhinoconjunctivitis (AR/AC) have relied on data analyses in which AR/AC was
the primary International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision-Clinic
al Modification (ICD-9-CM)-coded diagnosis, These studies ignore the costs
when AR/AC was a secondary diagnosis to other disorders such as asthma and
sinusitis, Objective: We sought to determine the national direct cost of il
lness for AR/AC.
Methods: An expert panel used the Delphi technique to estimate the proporti
on of visits coded by other primary ICD-9-CM diagnoses in which AR/AC was a
significant secondary comorbid condition. The costs of this proportion,wer
e deemed to be "attributable" to AR/AC and were added to the costs when all
ergic rhinitis and allergic conjunctivitis were the primary diagnoses.
Results: The cost when AR/AC was the primary diagnosis was $1.9 billion (in
1996 dollars). The cost when AR/AC was a secondary diagnosis was estimated
at $4.0 billion, giving an estimate of $5.9 billion for the overall direct
medical expenditures attributable to AR/AC, Outpatient services (63%, $3.7
billion), medications (25%, $1.5 billion), and inpatient services (12%, $0
.7 billion) accounted for the expenditures. Children 12 years and younger a
ccounted for $2.3 billion (38.0%).
Conclusion: Upper airway allergy is an expensive disease process because of
its readily apparent manifestations as AR/AC and its contribution to other
airway disorders.