This paper finds that, on average, targets that terminate takeover offers s
ignificantly increase their leverage ratios. Targets that increase their le
verage ratios the most reduce capital expenditures, sell assets, reduce emp
loyment, increase focus, and realize cash flows and share prices that outpe
rform their benchmarks in the five years following the failed takeover. Our
evidence suggests that leverage-increasing targets act in the interests of
shareholders when they terminate takeover offers and that higher leverage
helps firms remain independent not because it entrenches managers, but beca
use it commits managers to making the improvements that would be made by po
tential raiders.