The authors examined the potentially separable contributions of 2 elements
of intergroup cooperation, interaction and common fate, and the processes t
hrough which they can operate. The manipulation of interaction reduced bias
in evaluative ratings, which supports the idea that these components are s
eparable, whereas the manipulation of common fate when the groups were inte
racting was associated with lower bias in nonverbal facial reactions in res
ponse to contributions by in-group and out-group members. Whereas interacti
on activated several processes that can lead to reduced bias, including dec
ategorization, consistent with the common in-group identify model is (S. L.
Gaertner, J. F. Dovidio, P. A. Anastasio, B. A. Bachman, B M. C. Rust, 199
3) as well as M. Hewstone and R. J. Brown's (1986) group differentiation mo
del, the primary set of mediators involved participants' representations of
the memberships as 2 subgroups within a superordinate entity.