J. Zieren et al., Is mesh fixation necessary in abdominal hernia repair? Results of an experimental study in the rat, LANG ARCH S, 384(1), 1999, pp. 71-75
Background: Abdominal hernia repair with implantation of synthetic meshes u
sing the sublay technique has resulted in low recurrence rates and high pat
ient satisfaction. Aim: The purpose of this experimental animal study was t
o investigate whether mesh fixation is necessary in abdominal hernia repair
using a polypropylene mesh in the sublay technique. Methods: Forty-five ra
ts were divided into three groups after creating an abdominal wall defect (
CC control group, no mesh implantation; NoFixG mesh implantation without fi
xation group; SG mesh with suture fixation group) with 15 animals in each g
roup. Endpoints were clinical herniation pressure, hydroxyproline (HP) conc
entration, mesh shape and number of fibroblasts/collagen fibres of the anch
or zone 7, 14 and 90 days after implantation. Results: Herniation pressure,
HP content and number of fibroblasts were similar between NoFixG and SG, a
lthough significantly higher in these groups than in the CG (P<0.05). Both
mesh groups had significantly higher counts of fibroblasts and collagen fib
res than the CG. Mesh shrinking occurred in both groups but was less in the
SG. Conclusion: Mesh fixation was not mandatory in abdominal hernia repair
using this animal model.