Is mesh fixation necessary in abdominal hernia repair? Results of an experimental study in the rat

Citation
J. Zieren et al., Is mesh fixation necessary in abdominal hernia repair? Results of an experimental study in the rat, LANG ARCH S, 384(1), 1999, pp. 71-75
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
14352443 → ACNP
Volume
384
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
71 - 75
Database
ISI
SICI code
1435-2443(199902)384:1<71:IMFNIA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Background: Abdominal hernia repair with implantation of synthetic meshes u sing the sublay technique has resulted in low recurrence rates and high pat ient satisfaction. Aim: The purpose of this experimental animal study was t o investigate whether mesh fixation is necessary in abdominal hernia repair using a polypropylene mesh in the sublay technique. Methods: Forty-five ra ts were divided into three groups after creating an abdominal wall defect ( CC control group, no mesh implantation; NoFixG mesh implantation without fi xation group; SG mesh with suture fixation group) with 15 animals in each g roup. Endpoints were clinical herniation pressure, hydroxyproline (HP) conc entration, mesh shape and number of fibroblasts/collagen fibres of the anch or zone 7, 14 and 90 days after implantation. Results: Herniation pressure, HP content and number of fibroblasts were similar between NoFixG and SG, a lthough significantly higher in these groups than in the CG (P<0.05). Both mesh groups had significantly higher counts of fibroblasts and collagen fib res than the CG. Mesh shrinking occurred in both groups but was less in the SG. Conclusion: Mesh fixation was not mandatory in abdominal hernia repair using this animal model.