Despite the need to assess the ecological validity of jury simulation resea
rch before generalizing from simulations to the behavior of real jurors, su
rprisingly little jury reseal-ch has directly addressed issues of validity.
The present paper reviews the extant research on two aspects of the validi
ty question-specifically, research that has compared different samples of m
ock jurors, and research that has manipulated the medium of trial presentat
ion. In addition jury simulation research published in the first 20 years o
f Law and Human Behavior is analyzed with respect to these variables. The m
ajority of simulations used student-jurors and presented the trial in writt
en form. Additionally, the methodology of simulation research has actually
become less realistic over time. However this trend is not necessarily caus
e for concern, as a review of the literature reveals little research that h
as obtained differences between different mock juror samples or different t
rial media.