Influence of continuous combined estradiol norethisterone acetate preparations on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal nondiabetic women

Citation
R. Kimmerle et al., Influence of continuous combined estradiol norethisterone acetate preparations on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal nondiabetic women, MENOPAUSE, 6(1), 1999, pp. 36-42
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY
ISSN journal
10723714 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
36 - 42
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-3714(199921)6:1<36:IOCCEN>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objective: Estrogen-progestogen replacement therapy (HRT) may be associated with deterioration of insulin sensitivity in comparison to estrogens alone , which tend to improve insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. Insuli n sensitivity with the use of continuous combined 17-beta estradiol/norethi sterone acetate (E-2/NETA) preparations has not been examined before in pos tmenopausal women. Design: In a double-blind randomized parallel study, we evaluated the effec t of 2 mg E-2/l mg NETA thigh dose E-2/NETA), 1 mg E-2/0.5 mg NETA (low dos e E-2/NETA), or placebo (P) on the insulin sensitivity index (S-I) in three groups (18 women/group) of postmenopausal nondiabetic women (follicle stim ulating hormone [FSH] > 40 mIU/mL, mean +/- SD) aged 56 +/- 3 years, BMI 15 +/- 4 kg/m(2), cholesterol 233 +/- 42 mg/dL, and triglycerides 87 +/- 36 m g/dL, Insulin sensitivity was measured by means of a two-step hyperinsuline mic euglycemic glucose clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.25 and 1.0 mU/kg/min for 120 min each) at baseline and after 3 months of daily administration o f high dose E-2/NETA, low dose E-2/NETA, or P. Analysis was performed assum ing equivalence of start-end changes of insulin sensitivity among treatment groups (Anderson-Hauck test). Results: S-I was 7.7 +/- 2.9, 7.5 +/- 3.4, 6.8 +/- 2.2 at baseline and 6.3 +/- 3.0, 7.9 +/- 2.5, 7.1 +/- 3.1 mL/min/m(2) per mu U/mL 3 months after th e administration of high dose E-2/NETA, low dose E-2/NETA, and P, respectiv ely. The low dose E-2/NETA group had start-to-end changes of S-I which were equivalent to the P group (0.4 [95% confidence interval [CI] -0.8; 1.7] vs . 0.4 [-0.3; 1.0]) (p = 0.02). For the high dose E-2/NETA group, equivalenc e could not be shown with either the P (p = 0.89) or with the low dose E-2/ NETA group (p = 0.90). S-I within the high dose E-2/NETA group decreased by - .5 (95% CI -2.7; -0.2) mL/min/m(2) per mu U/mL. HbA(1c) decreased from 5 .3 +/- 0.3 to 5.1 +/- 0.3 within the high dose E-2/NETA group (p < 0.03) an d remained unchanged within the low dose E-2/NETA and P group. Fasting plas ma glucose, fasting serum insulin, and C-peptide, as well as triglycerides rind BMI were comparable among the groups at baseline and after 3 months. T otal cholesterol decreased by 12% and 8% in women treated with high dose an d low dose E-2/NETA (p < 0.02), respectively, and remained unchanged within the P group. Conclusions: These results indicate that 3 months use of a low dose continu ous E-2/NETA preparation does not change insulin sensitivity in postmenopau sal women. At high dose of E-2/NETA, a modest decrease seems possible. The effects of E-2/NETA on other parameters of carbohydrate and lipid metabolis m are neutral or favorable. (Menopause 1999;6:36-42. (C) 1999, The North Am erican Menopause Society.).