Efficacy and safety of eptastigmine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease

Citation
Bp. Imbimbo et al., Efficacy and safety of eptastigmine for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer's disease, NEUROLOGY, 52(4), 1999, pp. 700-708
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROLOGY
ISSN journal
00283878 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
700 - 708
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3878(19990310)52:4<700:EASOEF>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptastigmine in patients with moderate to moderately severe AD. Background: Eptastigmine is a centra lly acting cholinesterase inhibitor. Methods: The study was carried out acc ording a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, paral lel-group design. Patients received a 24-week treatment with placebo or ept astigmine 15 mg or 20 mg three times daily after a 4-week, stepwise dose es calation. The effects of treatment on cognition, global function, and activ ities of daily living were evaluated with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessmen t Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus), and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Livi ng scale (IADL), respectively. Results: Thirty-six centers recruited 491 pa tients: 164 on placebo, 166 on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily, and 16 1 on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Percentages of patients completi ng double-blinded treatment were 87% in the placebo group and 86% in both t he eptastigmine-treated groups. At the end of treatment, the intent-to-trea t analysis on 463 patients showed a dose-dependent effect of eptastigmine o n all efficacy variables, with a statistically significant effect of the 20 mg three times daily dose compared with placebo on the ADAS-Cog, CIBIC-Plu s, and IADL. Patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily performed sig nificantly better than placebo-treated patients only on the ADAS-Cog. Eleve n patients on placebo (7%), 13 patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times d aily (8%), and 12 patients on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily (8%) dis continued study treatment because of adverse events. Adverse events were re corded in 49% of patients on placebo compared with 54% on eptastigmine 15 m g three times daily and 48% on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Cholin ergic side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain) were re ported with similar frequency in the eptastigmine- and placebo-treated pati ents. There was a dose-dependent transient and mild neutropenic effect asso ciated with eptastigmine treatment, and one patient on 20 mg three times da ily had an asymptomatic pancytopenia. Conclusions: Eptastigmine produces si gnificant cognitive, clinical, and functional benefits in patients with pro bable AD. Although the cholinergic tolerability of eptastigmine was found t o be favorable, its potential adverse hematalogic effects limit its clinica l utility.