Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptastigmine in patients
with moderate to moderately severe AD. Background: Eptastigmine is a centra
lly acting cholinesterase inhibitor. Methods: The study was carried out acc
ording a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, paral
lel-group design. Patients received a 24-week treatment with placebo or ept
astigmine 15 mg or 20 mg three times daily after a 4-week, stepwise dose es
calation. The effects of treatment on cognition, global function, and activ
ities of daily living were evaluated with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessmen
t Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression
of Change Plus (CIBIC-Plus), and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Livi
ng scale (IADL), respectively. Results: Thirty-six centers recruited 491 pa
tients: 164 on placebo, 166 on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily, and 16
1 on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Percentages of patients completi
ng double-blinded treatment were 87% in the placebo group and 86% in both t
he eptastigmine-treated groups. At the end of treatment, the intent-to-trea
t analysis on 463 patients showed a dose-dependent effect of eptastigmine o
n all efficacy variables, with a statistically significant effect of the 20
mg three times daily dose compared with placebo on the ADAS-Cog, CIBIC-Plu
s, and IADL. Patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times daily performed sig
nificantly better than placebo-treated patients only on the ADAS-Cog. Eleve
n patients on placebo (7%), 13 patients on eptastigmine 15 mg three times d
aily (8%), and 12 patients on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily (8%) dis
continued study treatment because of adverse events. Adverse events were re
corded in 49% of patients on placebo compared with 54% on eptastigmine 15 m
g three times daily and 48% on eptastigmine 20 mg three times daily. Cholin
ergic side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain) were re
ported with similar frequency in the eptastigmine- and placebo-treated pati
ents. There was a dose-dependent transient and mild neutropenic effect asso
ciated with eptastigmine treatment, and one patient on 20 mg three times da
ily had an asymptomatic pancytopenia. Conclusions: Eptastigmine produces si
gnificant cognitive, clinical, and functional benefits in patients with pro
bable AD. Although the cholinergic tolerability of eptastigmine was found t
o be favorable, its potential adverse hematalogic effects limit its clinica
l utility.