B. Guillonneau et G. Vallancien, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations, PROSTATE, 39(1), 1999, pp. 71-75
BACKGROUND. Our purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncologi
cal efficacy, and intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of laparoscopi
c radical prostatectomy.
METHODS. We describe an original technique of laparoscopic radical prostate
ctomy per formed in 65 successive patients during 11 months.
RESULTS. Radical prostatectomy was performed entirely by laparoscopy in 59
patients (91%). The median operating time was 265 min, including times for
lymphadenectomy performed in 33% of patients. Preoperative complications in
cluded one rectal injury, sutured laparoscopically with an uneventful posto
perative course, and one epigastric artery injury which needed secondary op
en procedure. The transfusion rate was 15.4% (10 patients). Median postoper
ative vesical catheterization lasted 7 days. The reduction of: postoperativ
e pain allowed rapid discharge of patients, by the fourth postoperative day
in 60% of consenting patients. As regards oncological results, resection m
argins were negative in 57 patients (87.7%). The last prostate-specific ant
igen (PSA) assay was undetectable (<0.1 ng/ml) in 85.7% of the 42 patients
in whom PSA was available more than 1 month after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS. Radical prostatectomy can be routinely performed by laparoscop
y by an experienced team. Short-term oncological data were identical to the
results of conventional retropubic surgery, and morbidity was low. The lap
aroscopic approach could constitute in the future a technical improvement o
ver radical prostatectomy if long-term oncological results are confirmed an
d if improvement of intraoperative vision improves the functional results o
f this operation. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.