The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury - Part I: An evidence-based analysis of the published literature
Sc. Rao et Mg. Fehlings, The optimal radiologic method for assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with cervical spinal cord injury - Part I: An evidence-based analysis of the published literature, SPINE, 24(6), 1999, pp. 598-604
Study Design. An evidence-based analysis of published radiologic criteria f
or assessing spinal canal compromise and cord compression in patients with
acute cervical spinal cord injury.
Objectives. This study was conducted to determine whether literature-based
guidelines could be established for accurate and objective assessment of sp
inal canal compromise and spinal cord compression after cervical spinal cor
d injury.
Summary of Background Data. Before conducting multicenter trials to determi
ne the efficacy of surgical decompression in cervical spinal cord injury, r
eliable and objective radiographic criteria to define and quantify spinal c
ord compression must be established.
Methods. A computer-based search of the published English, German, and Fren
ch language literature from 1966 through 1997 was performed using MEDLINE (
U. S. National Library of Medicine database) to identify studies in which c
ervical spinal canal and cord size were radiographically assessed in a quan
titative manner. Thirty-seven references were included for critical analysi
s.
Results. Most studies dealt with degenerative disease, spondylosis and sten
osis; only 13 included patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Sta
ndard lateral radiographs were the most frequent imaging method used (23 st
udies). T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess
spinal cord compression in only 7 and 4 studies, respectively. Spinal cord
size or compression were not precisely measured in any of the cervical trau
ma studies. Interobserver or intraobserver reliability of the radiologic me
asurements was assessed in only 7 (19%) of the 37 studies.
Conclusions. To date, there are few quantitative, reliable radiologic outco
me measures for assessing spinal canal compromise or cord compression in pa
tients with acute cervical spinal cord injury.