The immunopotentiating activities of colloidal iron hydroxide, a novel, exp
erimental mineral adjuvant, and of aluminium hydroxide, the licensed adjuva
nt for human vaccines, were compared. Our studies revealed that colloidal i
ron hydroxide and aluminium hydroxide behaved comparably with respect to su
pporting induction of an antibody response to tetanus toroid. Furthermore,
mice immunized with both, the experimental Vaccine (tick-borne encephalitis
Virus (TBEV) antigen adsorbed to colloidal iron hydroxide) or with a comme
rcially available TBEV vaccine (adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide), devel
oped long-lasting antibody responses which protected the animals from TBEV
infection even one year after vaccination. The use of colloidal iron hydrox
ide as adjuvant had the additional advantage to reproducibly support induct
ion of HIV-1 envelope-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), when used as
adjuvant for a HIV-1 env-carrying recombinant fowlpox virus and being appli
ed via the subcutaneous route. Aluminium hydroxide was much less active in
this respect. Non-adjuvanted recombinant fowlpox elicited CTLs only when gi
ven intravenously or intraperitoneally, vaccination routes considered not t
o be suitable for routine use in humans. Further studies to evaluate the us
e of colloidal iron as possible alternative and/or supplement for routinely
used mineral adjuvants may therefore be warranted. (C) 1999 Elsevier Scien
ce Ltd. All rights reserved.