A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: II. Linking proximal outcomes of 12-Step and cognitive-behavioral treatment to substance use outcomes
Jw. Finney et al., A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: II. Linking proximal outcomes of 12-Step and cognitive-behavioral treatment to substance use outcomes, ALC CLIN EX, 23(3), 1999, pp. 537-544
This study examines the linkages in the treatment process chains that are t
hought to underlie two prevalent approaches to substance abuse treatment, t
raditional 12-Step treatment and cognitive-behavioral treatment. The focus
is on the "proximal outcomes" specified by the two treatment approaches and
their relation to "ultimate" substance use outcomes assessed at a 1-year f
ollow-up. A total of 2687 men who received treatment in 15 Department of Ve
terans Affairs substance abuse treatment programs were assessed at treatmen
t entry, at or near discharge, and at a 1-year follow-up. Based on the resu
lts of factor analyses, composite proximal outcomes variables were construc
ted to assess 12-Step cognitions, 12-Step behaviors, cognitive-behavioral b
eliefs, substance-specific coping, and general coping. Correlation analyses
indicated that some of the proximal outcome composites assessed at treatme
nt discharge were linked to 1-year outcomes, but the relationships were wea
k (r = .09 to .15). At follow-up, the cross-sectional relationships between
the proximal outcome composites and two substance use outcomes were strong
er, but still modest in magnitude (r = .16 to .39). The weak predictive fin
dings suggest some mechanism is needed to sustain treatment-induced change
on proximal outcomes so that positive ultimate outcomes can be achieved mor
e frequently, in this regard, participation in continuing care was associat
ed with enhanced maintenance of treatment gains on proximal outcomes. Howev
er, the modest cross-sectional relationships between proximal and substance
use outcomes at follow-up suggest that the theories; on which 12-Step and
cognitive-behavioral substance abuse treatments are based are not sufficien
tly comprehensive.