Therapeutic interchange of conjugated and esterified estrogens in a managed care organization

Citation
Wm. Baluch et al., Therapeutic interchange of conjugated and esterified estrogens in a managed care organization, AM J HEAL S, 56(6), 1999, pp. 537-542
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY
ISSN journal
10792082 → ACNP
Volume
56
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
537 - 542
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-2082(19990315)56:6<537:TIOCAE>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
A program designed to curb increases in drug costs in an HMO by substitutin g esterified for conjugated estrogens was developed and studied. Patients were voluntarily snitched from conjugated to esterified estrogens at an HMO in Washington State. Women were informed about the conversion thr ough newsletters and during clinic and pharmacy visits and received physici an and pharmacist counseling. Cost savings were estimated, and patient acce ptance was evaluated by interviewing women in four groups, including women who were switched from conjugated to esterified estrogens and then switched back (C-E-C group), women who were not switched (C-C group), and women who were switched to esterified estrogens and not switched back (C-E group). During the first six months, 14,601 (89.2%) of 16,364 women taking conjugat ed estrogens were switched to esterified estrogens; of these, 13,654 (93.5% ) continued taking esterified estrogens for at least six months. The HMO av oided $653,119 of an expected $750,000 cost increase for oral estrogen ther apy during the first year of the program. A total of 754 women were intervi ewed; 65.8% in the C-E-C group and 78.4% in the C-E group reported being sa tisfied with the information they received. The conversion experience was r ated as positive by 28.3% of women in the C-E-C group and 41.5% of women in the C-E group, negative by 25.1% and 8.9%, and neutral by 46.6% and 49.6%. An HMO avoided a large increase in drug costs by substituting esterified fo r conjugated estrogens; only 6.5% of patients were switched back to conjuga ted estrogens at their physicians' or their own request; most patients thou ght the conversion was a neutral or positive experience.