The safety of insulin lispro was compared with that of regular human insuli
n of recombinant DNA origin (Humulin R, Lilly), with special emphasis on th
e development and progression of the chronic complications of diabetes mell
itus in relation to insulin therapy.
Ten clinical trials of 3634 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellit
us were analyzed. The primary focus was treatment-emergent adverse events,
and the secondary focus was the development and progression of the chronic
complications of diabetes. The evaluations were based on pertinent laborato
ry values, predetermined disease-specific COSTART (coding symbol and thesau
rus for adverse event terminology) terms, physician evaluations of patients
, and physical examinations.
There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in the fr
equency of treatment-emergent adverse events or progression of retinopathy,
neuropathy, or cardiovascular disease reported with each therapy. There wa
s no difference between insulin lispro and Humulin R in the occurrence and
progression of kidney disease as measured by changes in serum creatinine le
vels.
Pooled data from clinical studies show that insulin lispro has a safety pro
file comparable to that of Humulin R.