OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of endoluminal CT colonogra
phy after an incomplete colonoscopy.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively studied 40 patients in whom the cecu
m could not be reached endoscopically despite adequate bowel preparation. E
ndoluminal CT colonography (120 kVp, 120 mA, 3-mm collimation, pitch of 2,
1.5-mm interval reconstruction) was performed within 2 hr of incomplete col
onoscopy. Two-dimensional multiplanar reformatted images and three-dimensio
nal endoluminal images were analyzed. Twenty-six patients (65%) underwent b
arium enema immediately after endoluminal CT colonography, We analyzed colo
nic distention; duration of endoluminal CT colonography; patient tolerance;
number of colonic segments seen at colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonograph
y, and barium enema; and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy as well as colo
nic and extracolonic findings.
RESULTS. Duration of endoluminal CT colonography was 14.2 +/- 4.6 min (mean
+/- SD). Endoluminal CT colonography was better tolerated than colonoscopy
or barium enema (p < .001), Probable causes for incomplete colonoscopy wer
e identified at endoluminal CT colonography in 74% of 40 patients. Baseline
colonic distention in the region of the transverse and right colon was con
sidered adequate before additional air insufflation; however, the addition
of air significantly enhanced colonic distention throughout the entire colo
n (p < .001). Endoluminal CT colonography adequately revealed 96% of all co
lonic segments; in comparison, barium enema adequately revealed 91% of all
segments (p < .05).
CONCLUSION. In patients with incomplete colonoscopy, endoluminal CT colonog
raphy successfully showed the previously unrevealed colon in more than 90%
of patients. Endoluminal CT colonography is a rapid, well-tolerated techniq
ue that provides clinically useful colonic and extracolonic information and
should be considered for all patients who undergo incomplete colonoscopy.