Injury to aberrant bile ducts during cholecystectomy: A common cause of diagnostic error and treatment delay

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of inj ured aberrant bile ducts in a population with complications after cholecyst ectomy and to determine whether such injury resulted in significant delay i n the diagnosis and treatment of bile duct injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS, The cholangiograms of 82 patients who sustained bile duct injury during cholecystectomy were reviewed. Prevalence of aberrant b ile duct anatomy in the injured ducts was noted. The time periods from inju ry to diagnosis and treatment of bile duct leaks in patients with aberrant bile duct anatomy were compared with those in patients with normal anatomy. RESULTS. Seventeen percent (14/82) of the patients were found to have aberr ant bile duct anatomy. Fifteen percent (12/82) were found to have had an ab errant bile duct involved in the injury. Eleven of the patients had an aber rant bile duct leak, and one patient had an aberrant bile duct clipping inj ury. The time period required for diagnosis and treatment of a leaking aber rant bile duct was significantly longer (p < .005) than that required for a bile leak in an anatomically normal bile duct. CONCLUSION. Aberrant bile ducts are present in a significant number of pati ents who sustain bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Diagnosis of an aberrant bile duct leak may be delayed because of nonfilling of the bile d uct during standard cholangiographic techniques. Careful examination of cho langiograms for nonfilling segments and contrast material injection of bilo ma drains and T tubes may shorten the time to definitive treatment for this group of patients.