OBJECTIVE, Manual administration of IV contrast material results in unpredi
ctable injection rates. Our purpose was to determine the effect of bolus tr
acking on overall abdominal helical CT scan quality, particularly on hepati
c enhancement, in children with manually administered contrast media.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. We compared 33 abdominal helical CT scans of 29 chil
dren in whom bolus tracking was used with 22 CT scans of a control group of
21 children in whom bolus tracking was not used. All contrast material was
administered by manual injection. Qualitative assessment was made of organ
and vessel enhancement and overall scan appearance. Quantitative assessmen
t using region-of-interest cursors was performed at three anatomic levels,
and the results for the two groups of children were compared.
RESULTS. Qualitative comparison of enhancement parameters between the bolus
tracking group (number given first) and the control group (number given se
cond) yielded the following: splenic artifact in 9% versus 23% (p = .24); i
nferior vena cava flow artifact in 3% versus 27% (p = .01); scanning during
the nephrographic phase in 89% versus 59% (p = .02); and good quality grad
e in 79% versus 64% (p = .23). Significantly greater hepatic enhancement (a
s measured in mean Hounsfield units) was achieved in the bolus tracking gro
up than in the control group at the superior (48.5 versus 28.6; p < .001),
middle (47.9 versus 32.3; p < .001), and inferior (48.2 versus 36.5; p = .0
1) levels. Hepatic enhancement increased significantly from the superior to
the inferior level in the control group (p < .02), whereas enhancement was
homogeneous in the bolus tracking group (p > .50).
CONCLUSION. Bolus tracking provides improved contrast enhancement, includin
g significantly greater hepatic enhancement, during abdominal helical CT in
children in whom the rate of injection of contrast material is unpredictab
le.