Are long hours and hard work detrimental to end-clerkship examination scores?

Citation
Jd. Gerhardt et al., Are long hours and hard work detrimental to end-clerkship examination scores?, AM J SURG, 177(2), 1999, pp. 132-135
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00029610 → ACNP
Volume
177
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
132 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9610(199902)177:2<132:ALHAHW>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Third-year medical students' complaints focus on the number of hours worked and subsequent lack of study time among three general surgery blocks. We hypothesize that this difference between the surgical blocks doe s not adversely influence student examination scores. METHODS: Student scores for the academic years 1996-97 to 1997-98 for the N ational Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) surgery subtests were compiled. A comparison of two "slow"' general surgery blocks (B/C) with one "busy" blo ck (A) was made using a two-tailed t test. A multiple regression analysis w as also employed. Finally, United Stales Medical Licensing Examination (USM LE) part I scores were used to determine equivalency of groups. RESULTS: NO significant difference existed between block A and blocks B/C i n USMLE part I and NBME (P = 0.35 and 0.16 respectively). However, USMLE an d rotation sequence influenced NBME scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that no difference exists in examination score s between students assigned to a busy general surgery block versus those st udents assigned to slow blocks.(C) 1999 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.